Sunday, December 9, 2012

Blog #14 - CSCP reflection & Article


What did you learn from this assignment?

I feel there is still much to learn about ASCA's National Model especially in implementation as it is aligned with a specific school. However, what I took most from this assignment was the collaboration in developing the comprehensive program. Collaboration is a key component of a successful school counseling program. Of course, I feel I understand the four elements of the model more than I did 15 weeks ago (especially the delivery and accountability) as well as the flow of the model, but the themes keep sounding in my head. Only through effective leadership, advocacy, and collaboration can systemic change occur for the benefit of all students.

 

What is the biggest barrier to implementing a CSCP?

The existing school system is what I see to be the biggest barrier to implementing a CSCP. For instance, I recently shadowed an elementary school counselor that was balancing duties between two schools. His job mainly consists of managing IEP's. He conducts classroom guidance lessons twice a year and as needed. There are two small groups that he runs for fourth and fifth graders and does little individual counseling. Although, I sensed that he would like it to be different, he is at the mercy of the administration's expectations. Perhaps if he were younger, (he is retiring this year) he may be interested in slowly affecting change. Traditional programs are difficult to break or change because the system has become comfortable. I believe that until they are provided with data showing its lack of effectiveness then no one is interested in what the change might look like. They need to see the data-driven results to understand what positive effect the counselor could have on student achievement if change were allowed.

   

What are three practical pieces that can be applicable to your practicum?

Although I am unsure of the perspective of the district, an advisory council would be a piece of the CSCP that I would like to see utilized. In addition, the lesson plans we developed and found will be beneficial as I hope to encourage classroom guidance lessons at the secondary level. Being creative is one of my fortes, but I also acknowledge the necessity of having what we do be evidenced-based. Therefore, another practical piece to apply in practicum will be the pre and post tests for guidance lessons and small groups.

 

What do you feel about your overall preparation to implement this program?
 
I believe Nate had shared, ' I'm still not sure what we did.' To some degree, I concur. Fifteen weeks ago, this project seemed incomprehensible. Now, I have to say that I am comfortable with the design of the model and feel more at ease with the idea of implementing the program. I know when it is time to do so there very well will be hiccups, but that with a cohesive team, barriers are surmountable.  

 

Listen to the Voices:

Dahir, Burnham, and Stone's (2009) findings did not surprise me especially after reading the various research articles this semester.  However, one finding did. The authors found that middle school counselors reported higher results for involvement in personal/social and academic development. I had expected that the elementary level would have scored higher in at least the personal/social component. It has been my understanding that elementary school counselors are much more likely to conduct classroom guidance lessons and focus on the personal/social domain. I see now this is not always true. Middle school counselors are proactively emphasizing the personal/social components of the ASCA National Model, sometimes more than the elementary level.
 

Dahir, C. A., Burnham, J. J., and Stone, C. (2009). Listen to the voices: School counselors and comprehensive school counseling programs. Professional School Counseling, 12(3), 182-192.

No comments:

Post a Comment