Over the
years, data and accountability has been an issue that has needed to be
discussed. However, as time went on there
has became a larger focus. According to
the article by Gysbers (2004), the thought of a program needing to be complete
started in 1930 and evolved over the years.
It was found and noted that a well developed program would result in
better grades, attendance, fewer discipline issues, better all around school,
etc. I found it interesting reading a
quote that Hudson (1935) stated, "These are days...when all school
activities are subject to the sharpest scrutiny, and the administrator is
called upon to justify every expenditure of time and money in the operation of
the school," (pg. 21) made in 1940s.
The interesting part is that in my opinion things have not changed in
that sense. We are always being looked at
and questioned in what we are doing and how it is supporting our students. Essentially we need to support the resources
that schools are using and have evidence that what we are using works. Then in 1970, the accountability deepened
even more bringing in the terms of goals, objectives, implementation plans, and
design for evaluation. Pine (1975)
stated that "In this age of accountability the
evaluation of school counseling is of paramount concern to all counselors
regardless of their theoretical and philosophical biases" (pg. 136). Currently, accountability continues to grow
and now it is required for teachers and counselors to provide data that proves
growth in the academics, personal/social, and career paths of our students. It is not good enough just to say that a
particular program works. What we need
to answer is how do you know? What
evidence is presented.
This
then leads into the chapter on accountability which focused on data. Dollarhide and Saginak (2012) open the
chapter with a vignette regarding "Mt Data's Dilemma." This vignette brought many discussion topics
and the first area that stuck out to me was the fact that teachers are more
familiar with data compared to counselors.
As a teacher we are held accountable throughout our day and with all
that we do with our students but how do counselors collect data? As a teacher going into the counseling
profession I feel as though I have background knowledge that will aid me in
this process; however, I need to look at data in a different light because it
is not just academics. Even though I
need to be looking at the academic, I also need to be referring to the
personal/social and career aspects. One
area that I feel as though could be looked at; at least in my school is the
impact of the Olweus program. I would be
interested in comparing and contrasting the survey that went out the students
last year to the same given at the end of this year. This would hopefully show that the program
that we participated in affected the student population in a positive manner
and decreased the amount of bullying.
Bullying is a major issue than may not ever be completely eliminated but
the hope is that with the right program the issues would decrease. When it comes to accountability, I feel that
everyone in the school needs to have some accountability with the growth of our
students because we are all there to reach the main goal of student achievement
and building a better all around school morale.
In conclusion, accountability will continue to grow and evolve. As future counselors, I feel as though we
need to be aware of how data can be collected across various topics.
Dollarhide,
C. T. & Saginak, K. A. (2012). Comprehensive school counseling programs: K-12
delivery systems in action (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River , NJ :
Pearson Education, Inc.
Gysbers, N. (2004). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: The evolution of accountability.Professional
School
Counseling, 8(1), 1-14.
Gysbers, N. (2004). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: The evolution of accountability.
No comments:
Post a Comment