The first story regarding Cody grabbed my interest for a couple of reasons. First, because of my own life experiences, I have a strong desire to see justice for every one. Secondly, there have been a couple of situations with my kids that I had to take further up the chain of command because the answers I was getting from teachers and/or principals were not satisfactory. In fact, in one instance, we had to bring the district superintendent into the matter. Turns out that the teacher in question had further buried herself through the discussion and it was perhaps one of the final issues the administration was willing to handle; therefore, a couple months later we noticed that she had been forced to resign. I gather we were simply the straw that broke the camel's back. It is situations like this that I see the necessity to gather evidence of the problem, be respectful, go through the chain of command, and do not quit until there is a satisfactory answer for the student. The struggle that I foresee is that I will not have just four children to advocate for, but hundreds. I hope that if or when a situation like Cody's arises that I will not passively sit by, but rather gather the necessary data for the principal to review in order to make a better-educated decision on Cody's behalf.
Dollarhide and Saginak's (2012) chapter two further opened my eyes to how multi-faceted the role of the school counselor is and how much the school counselor seems to be a central figure in coordinating the various elements of education for the students, community, administration, and staff. The multitude of partnerships that are necessary to effectively advocate for the students seems a little overwhelming. Overwhelming because there are times when particular "partners" (i.e. teachers, parents, students) will be on opposite sides of a disagreement; one in which the school counselor will need to mediate. Being in a position of not taking sides is easier said than done.
It was disappointing as well as encouraging reading Whiston and Sexton (1998) as well as McGannon, Carey, and Dimmitt (2005) on current research of school counseling. Disappointing because there doesn't seem to be enough data to provide enough evidence for the effectiveness of interventions used by school counselors and encouraging because there seems to be an awareness growing for the need of more research. As McGannon et al. pointed out there are several organizations that have been created to focus solely on outcome research for school counseling. Despite the acclimation process to a new position once graduating from this program, I hope that I will be able to work with other counselors in conducting research. One curiosity that arose from reading the articles is where to find the interventions discussed in the research. And is there training involved for some of them (i.e. the STEP intervention)?
Dollarhide, C. T. & Saginak, K. A. (2012).
Comprehensive school counseling programs: K-12 delivery systems in action (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
McGannon, W., Carey, J., and Dimmit, C. (2005).
The current status of school counseling outcome research. Amherst, MA: Center for School Counseling Outcome Research.
Whiston, S. C. & Sexton, T. L. (1998). A review of school counseling outcome research: Implications for practice.
Journal of Counseling & Development,76, 412-426.